Next

Racist Wars : At Least Somebody’s Talking About it…

Give it a read.

“If you are an avid viewer of Fox News or a reader of the New York Times, then Israel is yet to exceed its legitimate legal boundaries: that of a democracy opting to defend its citizens. But only racism can lead to such rationale. Only a racist media portrays the capture of a soldier whose army units have besieged Gazans for years, denying them food and medicine, as a violation of all that is holy. Only a racist media presents the kidnapping of 9,000 Palestinians, now in Israeli jails, as a just outcome of Israel’s routine arrests of Palestinian terrorists or potential terrorists. Only racism can play down the Israeli destruction of Gaza’s infrastructure, which is justified without question, for such actions are necessary to impede the militants’ efforts.” – Ramzy Baroud: Racist Media Coverage of Gaza Assault

Amen.

17
Jul 2006
POSTED BY KarmaMole
POSTED IN

SeptiC (Politics)

DISCUSSION No Comments

Semantic Spaghetti : Don’t Confuse Issues…

This is the text of an email I just sent to Al-Jazeera while reading the article mentioned in the previous post. The message is important enough, and it’s an issue I just haven’t got around to discussing here. So here it goes…


Al-Jazeera Editors,

Hi, I ran into the poll on your website called ‘Is Israeli action in Gaza an overreaction?’ – and I am very saddened to see that your editors have allowed themselves to get distracted by such a question.

The issue at hand is not whether ‘Israel’ is overreacting. This question IMPLIES that ‘Israel’ is right in ESSENCE, but might simply be guilty of being HARSH. Using terminology like this, as Western Media has been using removes the focus from how WRONG the Zionists are, how INJUST the actions are, and wonders only if it is ‘heavy-handed’ – An idiotic attitude, shared by many, and that leads only to the victim asking for compassion from his rapist.

Please consider this point. I write to you in earnest.

Thank you for your time.

All things considered, the word ‘idiotic’ might not have been helpful.

So much for diplomacy.

16
Jul 2006
POSTED BY KarmaMole
POSTED IN

SeptiC (Politics)

DISCUSSION No Comments

Aljazeera.Net – Lebanon blames US for UN silence

Okay, I just followed a Google News headline to Aljazeera.Net – Lebanon blames US for UN silence, incredibly, the text states that

“Cesar Mayoral, Argentina’s UN ambassador, said the United States objected to any statement and Britain opposed calling for a ceasefire.

The US and Britain want to wait for the outcome of this weekend’s Group of Eight meeting in Russia, an Arab League foreign ministers meeting, and a mission sent to the Middle East by Kofi Annan…”

Meaning, basically, that they insist on the ‘right’ of the Zionists to kill innocent children while they negotiate. Which – if you take one single step backwards, means they’re negotiating over the killing of innocent children

So much for compassion, humanity, and the pursuit of happiness.

16
Jul 2006
POSTED BY KarmaMole
POSTED IN

SeptiC (Politics)

DISCUSSION No Comments

Rebel Without A Clue?

Oh, c’mon. You just know you wanna read more about that daredevil, reckless, death defying, fearless monster of a warrior we all like to call…Bush.

Well, check this out, according to the Boston Globe:

President Bush has quietly claimed the authority to disobey more than 750 laws enacted since he took office, asserting that he has the power to set aside any statute passed by Congress when it conflicts with his interpretation of the Constitution.

Nifty, eh? The man fears nothing.

Can’t imagine how incredible his leadership is? Check out this visual aid!


C’mon! Admit it! Now you’re impressed!

Well, in any case – check out the article at the Boston Globe. It details the fearless commanders exploits in much more detail! Telling you about all kinds of laws that he’s chosen to ignore and side-step. The man is a fearless juggler! A mine-field jogger! A drunk bull in a china shop!

Yeah. I’m sunny side up today.

10
Jul 2006
POSTED BY KarmaMole
POSTED IN

SeptiC (Politics)

DISCUSSION No Comments

More Love From Abu Ghraib…

Maybe I should call this post ‘More Pics From The Crypt‘…

In any case, it turns out there are over 60 more pictures from Abu Ghraib that haven’t been widely published. You can see some of them here.

Here are a couple of samples, just in case you can’t hold your breath that long. Herefor example is a picture of a brave American soldier fighting for freedom


Inspiring, no?

Here’s another. You’ll notice the recurring and apparent fondness for nude prisoners. Something the American G.I. seems to have in spades…


Tasteful, n’est pas?

It’s 2006…do you know where your children are?

10
Jul 2006
POSTED BY KarmaMole
POSTED IN

SeptiC (Politics)

DISCUSSION No Comments

Defining Terrorism: The Road To Hell

The road to hell, as they say, is paved with good intentions.

Apparently, that’s true.

A friend of mine recently pointed me to a website carrying an English translation of the Quran, thinking it would do me good to read some of it. I checked the link, and then shortened the URL to see the home page. Lo and behold! The front page had a nice little condemnation – in a small black box on the right, reading ‘We condemn all acts of violence, killing, and suicide bombings carried out in the name of Islam‘.

Oh, gosh. Aren’t these cute Moslems sane?

Let’s consider this for a moment…

Notice it does not state that they condemn all acts of violence against, say, innocents. No! The site that claims to be spreading the religion of Islam and teaching about it condemns ‘all acts of violence carried out in the name of Islam’. All! Which can only lead me to conclude that they also condemn, say – lashings and capital punishment, whether or not these are dictated by Islam!

Yes, it gets confusing. With friends like these

Some would argue that I’m being facetious, but I’m not.

There’s a whole camp of supposedly well-intentioned but apparently idiotic so-called ‘Moslems’ who are doing their very best to distance themselves as much as possible from any acceptance of violence – the implicit assumption being that violence is barbaric, unjust, and always a manifestation of terrorism. The last resort of the backward, the feeble minded, etc…

These are the same people who when confronted with the terrors of a Jenin, suggest Gandhi-esque non-violence to Palestinians. Briefly put, they are not Moslems, nor even quite human. They are fairies, living in Disneyland, wondering how much whitening cream their faces can take before their skin finally peels off and falls to the ground.

Another example of this is a recent television ad that I saw on MBC2. It shows a suicide bomber blowing himself up in a market, chaos ensues, people flying all over the place. A child looking on in fear. Etc. Etc…It ends with the message “Terrorism Has No Religion”.

Right. Can’t you just feel the epiphany?

Gosh, they’re clever, those cute, sane…domesticated ‘Moslems’.

But not all violence is terrorism, and whereas an attack on innocents is unjustifiable by any rational or religious means, violence in and of itself is often necessary, sometimes advisable, and occasionally mandatory. Peaceful persuasion and rational negotiations work when the conflict is a result of a misunderstanding, but NOT when you are simply being invaded, occupied, robbed, or raped. In cases such as those, arguing that ‘losing your temper’ or ‘resorting to violence’ is ‘wrong’ is simply criminal.

By placing messages such as these, the messengers are implicitly accepting the notion, peddled by Western imperialists to the Middle-East, that any violence or resistance is both backward and, on a more sinister note, punishable. It is an appeal to fairy and coward alike.

Hold a flower. Bow down. Bend over. Smile.

Who Loves Ya, Baby?

09
Jul 2006
POSTED BY KarmaMole
POSTED IN

SeptiC (Politics)

DISCUSSION 2 Comments
08
Jul 2006
POSTED BY KarmaMole
POSTED IN

SeptiC (Politics)

DISCUSSION No Comments